The Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology

Abstract

Assuming that word-prosodic parameters are organized into a hierarchical tree where certain parameters are embedded under others, this paper proposes the Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis (PAPH). The PAPH predicts different levels of difficulty and paths to be followed by L2 (and L1) learners based on the typological properties of their L1 and the L2 they are learning. On the PAPH, L2 acquisition is assumed to be brought along via a process of parameter resetting. During this process, certain parameters are expected to be easier to reset than others, based on such factors as economy, markedness, and robustness of the input, which is reflected in part by their location on the tree of parameters proposed in this paper. Evidence for the proposal comes from previous formal phonological and L1 acquisition literature. The predictions as concerns the learning path are tested through an experiment which examines productions of English-speaking learners of Turkish, thereby involving two languages that are maximally different from each other regarding the location of word-level prominence, as well as how it is assigned. The PAPH is a restrictive (and falsifiable) approach, where the predictions regarding the stages learners go through are constrained both by certain learning principles and by the options made available by UG.

Keywords

prosody, stress, phonology, language acquisition, learnability, UG, variability in L2 acquisition

How to Cite

Özçelik, Ö., (2016) “The Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology”, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 1(1): 28. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.47

Download

Download PDF

2344

Views

1301

Downloads

11

Citations

Share

Authors

Öner Özçelik (Department of Central Eurasian Studies, Indiana University)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 35e5f64eed9e2da3b86d6b0aaf771d1a